Theo Van Gogh: The Filmmaker Who Stirred Up Dutch Society
- dthholland
- Nov 2, 2024
- 4 min read
Theo Van Gogh, Dutch filmmaker and outspoken critic, was no stranger to controversy. Like his famous great-granduncle, the painter Vincent Van Gogh, Theo seemed to challenge societal norms in his own way, although his style was more confrontational than Vincent’s quiet introspection. Theo used his voice and films to address topics that many others hesitated to touch. He had a knack for provoking just about everyone, often using humour and sharp language that some found insightful and others found offensive.
How Was Theo Van Gogh Related to Vincent Van Gogh?
Theo Van Gogh was Vincent Van Gogh’s great-grandnephew, which might partly explain his taste for pushing artistic and social boundaries. Vincent, known for his radical approach to art in the late 19th century, faced his share of criticisms and lived a difficult life, often misunderstood by the society around him. While Vincent expressed himself through painting, Theo’s chosen medium was film, and his focus wasn’t just on artistic expression but also on making pointed statements about politics, religion, and social issues.
A Voice for Free Speech — No Matter the Cost
Theo Van Gogh saw himself as a defender of free speech and wasn’t shy about airing his opinions. His work often came with an edge, as he sought to challenge what he viewed as restrictive or harmful ideologies. This stance led him to collaborate with Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali-born Dutch politician and former Muslim who was vocal about issues within Islam, especially around women’s rights. Their joint project, Submission, Part I, sought to highlight the struggles some Muslim women face under restrictive interpretations of Islamic teachings.
The short film depicted a woman praying to Allah for release from an abusive life, with Qur’anic verses written on her skin. Through this imagery, the film aimed to question what Hirsi Ali and Van Gogh saw as the subjugation of women within some Islamic communities. Van Gogh argued that the film was meant to open up discussion about the rights and freedoms of women, though he knew it would be controversial.
The Growing Tensions that Led to Van Gogh’s Murder
Submission, Part I did indeed spark a response, but perhaps more intensely than Van Gogh anticipated. While many found the film thought-provoking, it was deeply offensive to conservative Muslim communities, who viewed the imagery as disrespectful and blasphemous. Van Gogh, known for being outspoken, seemed unconcerned about potential backlash. When warned about his safety, he famously replied, “No one kills the village idiot.”
Two months after the film’s release, on November 2, 2004, Theo Van Gogh was cycling through Amsterdam when he was approached by Mohammed Bouyeri, a young Dutch-Moroccan who had become deeply radicalised. Bouyeri, carrying a letter of condemnation, targeted Van Gogh for what he saw as an unforgivable insult to Islam. Bouyeri was driven by anger over the film’s portrayal of Islamic teachings and, more specifically, by his frustration with Hirsi Ali, the film’s writer. Under police protection, Hirsi Ali was difficult to reach, and Theo, unguarded, became the accessible target.
Bouyeri saw himself as a defender of his faith. He believed that Western society, with people like Van Gogh and Hirsi Ali, was attacking Islam and that extreme measures were needed to stop these voices. Van Gogh’s murder, shocking as it was, was a statement from Bouyeri’s perspective: a drastic response to a work he believed went too far.
Van Gogh was shot several times and had his throat slit by Mohammed Bouyeri while cycling to work on 2 November 2004 at about 9 o'clock in the morning. Bouyeri also injured some bystanders and left a note pinned to Van Gogh's stomach with a knife containing death threats to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who went into hiding. The note also threatened Western countries and Jews, and referred to ideologies of the Egyptian organisation Jama'at al-Muslimin.
Bouyeri, a 26-year-old Dutch-Moroccan citizen, was apprehended by police after a chase. Authorities alleged that he had terrorist ties with the Dutch Islamist Hofstad Network. He was charged with the attempted murder of several police officers and bystanders, illegal possession of a firearm, and conspiring to murder others, including Hirsi Ali. He was convicted at trial on 26 July 2005, and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole.
A Turning Point in Dutch Society
Theo Van Gogh’s death was a pivotal moment for the Netherlands. In a country celebrated for its liberal ideals, the murder brought intense debates about freedom of expression and the challenges of multiculturalism to the forefront. The Dutch public and politicians found themselves torn between supporting freedom of speech and dealing with a growing sense of unease about radicalisation within the Muslim community.
The aftermath saw a change in Dutch society. Immigration policies became more scrutinised, and debates around integration grew louder. Dutch politicians began to receive threats, and discussions around free speech became tense, as people feared either reprisal or appearing intolerant. The once-open approach to immigration and diversity now had a layer of caution attached.
Over the years, Theo Van Gogh’s murder has continued to influence public dialogue in the Netherlands. Many still remember him as a staunch advocate for free speech, someone who didn’t back down from making statements, however uncomfortable they might have been. His death remains a reminder of the complex dynamics between expression and respect, freedom and responsibility, especially in a world as diverse as the Netherlands.
